Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

advertise with us
Sponsored by
Read more about on-line and in print,
advertising or call 01723 363636 now.
 
 
Tuesday, 6th January 2009

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scarborough Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Pier was not Vincent's own work



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 20 November 2008
IN RESPONSE to Mick Jefferson's piece on William Vincent (Diary, November 12), I have received several indignant correspondence from your readers on the subject of the so-called Vincent's pier in Scarborough harbour.
However, I have to confirm that Vincent, the borough’s marine engineer from 1732 until 1752, had no responsibility for either of today’s Old Pier or Lighthouse Pier. During the 1730s, Vincent built only an extension or spur to the Great Pier, as it w
as then called, and even then the plan of it was designed by his predecessor, William Lellam.

Later, in 1739, Vincent cut a gap or Pet Hole to separate the end of the old pier from his spur to allow better scouring of the inner harbour. He died in 1755.

In 1800 Vincent’s detached spur was washed away by a great storm and then replaced between 1804 and 1806 by the stone pier on which the first lighthouse was built in the latter year.

So the distinguished engineers William Lellam, John Smeaton and William Chapman, who were chiefly responsible for the construction of Scarborough’s older harbour works, remain entirely unremembered, whereas William Vincent received entirely undeserved credit for pier(s) which he never built. And Vincent even has a Scarborough street named after him!

Still, I suppose we are stuck with Vincent’s Pier, just as Scarborians are now forever unable to divest themselves of Oliver’s Mount, which is even more misleading, and Oliver’s Heights, which is merely preposterous.

In final fairness to Vincent, he did supervise the construction for the first sea staith or wall to protect the Spaw and cut back the ‘Spaw Cliff’ behind it which endangered the wells after the ‘earthquake’ of 1737 had buried them.

Dr Jack Binns

Chatsworth Gardens

Scarborough



The full article contains 304 words and appears in Scarborough Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 19 November 2008 9:20 AM
  • Source: Scarborough Evening News
  • Location: Scarborough
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.