Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

advertise with us
Sponsored by
Read more about on-line and in print,
advertising or call 01723 363636 now.
 
 
Monday, 1st December 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scarborough Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

A64 upgrades are a 'token gesture' - COMMENT ON THIS STORY



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 06 September 2008
LEADING Scarborough councillors have hit out at the decision to put forward a "token gesture" of £4.5 million towards improving the notorious A64 road.
North Yorkshire County Council's Ryedale area committee was told by Highways Agency boss Andrew Brown at a meeting held in Pickering that the sum will be spent on a chain of schemes along the road to improve safety for pedestrians, cyclists and bus passengers.

But Cllr Andrew Backhouse and Cllr David Jeffels said the upgrade will do little to decrease the number of accidents on the A64.

Cllr Backhouse, a Conservative, parish, borough and county councillor for Lindhead said: "This £4.5 million is something that has been thrown at it to try and pacify people who have been calling for great improvements and necessary improvements. It is nothing, barely a token gesture."

Eighteen months ago Cllr Backhouse set up a petition on the Number 10 website calling for the A64 to be fully dualled.

He believed visitors and new businesses were put off coming to the area due to traffic congestion caused by single-lane sections of the A64. He hoped local people would add their names and increase the pressure for improvements to be made – but less than 1,000 people signed up.

Scarborough, Ryedale and North Yorkshire County councils have been working on a long-running campaign calling for the road to be dualled.

However, the Highways Agency has said it could cost more than £500 mill-ion and the Regional Transport Board has not included it in its list of priorities up until 2016

Cllr Jeffels said: "We probably accept that we aren't going to get what most people would desire –- a fully-blown dual carriageway – but a lot of other improvements could be made.

"The stretch of road between Seamer and Rillington is where drivers have great difficulty in overtaking. It is quite narrow and I do feel it could be widened."

He added: "The road does have a bad accident record and it is a problem that is only going to get worse in the future. With the Sands project and the investment going on at Scarborough Business Park the demand for upgrade is going to increase. Until that happens, we are going to see more serious road accidents.

The biggest upgrade, costing £1.1 million, will see the pavement between Scampston and Knapton renewed, while a further £400,000 will be invested in a cycle-way between Knapton and West Heslerton.

The full article contains 423 words and appears in Scarborough Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 06 September 2008 7:49 AM
  • Source: Scarborough Evening News
  • Location: Scarborough
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Against Bereaurcracy.,

06/09/2008 08:31:54
The upgrade of the A64 is estimated at £500 million cost to tax payer and councillor Backhouse justifies this degree of expenditure on the grounds of increased traffic coming to the 97 flats at the Sands project, if it that essential perhaps Benchmark would like to cough up, as a tax payer I do not!!!.
2

BGS,

06/09/2008 09:28:31
If Cllr Jeffles is correct that most people desire a fully blown carriageway, I wonder why Cllr Backhouses petition raised less than a thousand supporters? Considerably more petitioned against the premature closure of Kinderland!
3

Lady Taurus ,

Scarborough 06/09/2008 12:43:33
It's alright asking for the upgrade to be made to the A64 road into Scarborough. If it is ever done what will happen then when all the traffic tries to get into town?

It all seems madness to me and as we have already read on this site some companies have shut up shop and gone!

Also who will pay for this to be done? Look what happened in Hull when they built the Humber Bridge.
4

Amaroo,

Scarborough 06/09/2008 17:10:09
I would have given Cllr. Backhouse more credit than to come out in company with Cllr. Jeffels.

The upgrade of the A64 is a non starter, improving parts of it may be worth it. But this ludicrous notion of a dual carriageway from Malton to Scarborough will never ever come to fruition simply because of cost.

All that said and as commented above in another post. We are unable to accomodate the traffic inflow we already get so we do not require it coming in any quicker. The white elephant the council call a Park & Ride on Seamer Road will have more car spaces than filled ones thats for sure.

And the silly comment from Cllr. Jeffels re 'The Sands' and his obvious suggestion of increased traffic flow to that begs belief.

If it costs a million pound for a renewed pavement between Scampston and Knapton that says it all about a dual carriageway I think !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
5

English like wot she is meant to be spoke,

06/09/2008 21:35:24
Well said Amaroo.

If the only justification for dualling the A64 is to allow the rich out of towners to get to the Sands 5 mins quicker I for one will happily sit in jams for a few more years!
6

Scarborough born n bred,

07/09/2008 13:47:59
Up grading the A64 is a must, certainly for businessess in Scarborough area. If they start it now it would cost £500mil approx but by the time 2016 comes it will probably cost over double that.

The goverment should foot the bill after all we pay road tax and tax on fuel and the goverment has just made a billion in taxes after the fuel price rises.

The council should have put the park and ride outside of seamer near Mallorys or there abouts and had a shuttle train into town. If the dual carrigeway was to go ahead, it should be like Blackpool. Dual carrige way into a massive car park with a football ground all there.
And while im having a small rant what the point of all the traffic lights along Seamer road that just slows the traffic down even more and makes what should be a 5 min trip to B+Q into 15mins.

Whats the point in spending all that money on a pavement between Scampston and Knapton with not many of the population using the pavement compared to the shear volume of traffic that uses the A64. If they use the money and do a little bit each year its a start!
7

Amaroo,

Scarborough 07/09/2008 15:09:41
I do not believe that between the end of the Seamer By-Pass dual carriageway and the start of the Norton/Malton By-Pass dual carriageway if made into dual carriage way will effect Scarborough to any degree.

All it would do is make it easier for more traffic to get to Scarborough quicker and then find they have nowhere to go once here.

This 'business' supposed need is nothing but a smoke screen being used as the reason for an upgrade. As the road is, it does not take that long to cover the distance between dual carriageways. McCains for one who use big lorries on this road seem to manage okay.

The outlay no matter who pays for it does not warrent the return on this short distance.

We all know that the Park & Ride should have been out near Morrisons but land for building development is worth more than cars on a car park. Consequently, whoever in their wisdom thought it better to go almost into the town itself. That's logical thinking !!!!!!!!!
8

Lady Taurus ,

Scarborough 07/09/2008 16:28:58
#6:SBnB: Where have you been for the last 2 years? We have written many times on this site, protesting about the Park & Ride being built on Seamer Rd.

We have also suggested that it should have been built out at Seamer and the visitors shuttled in by train.

Talk to most drivers and passengers and they all agree it is in the wrong place. The roundabout at Musham Bank, near the garage can't cope with the volume of traffic now.

It is no use everyone now protesting, it's too late! I have been told this "It has to work"
9

fedupwithsittingatlights,

Scarborough 08/09/2008 04:14:49
I agree with all the comments above regarding the suggested A64 improvements. However, I am yet again flabbergasted at yet more money being thrown at improving pavements and cycleways on the A64. I travel this road regularly and can count on one hand the amount of people who use this facility! What about a footpath between Cayton and Lebberston for the schoolchildren, caravanners and market goers? One existed years ago and just need reinstating. The work rises to the top of the councils 'must-do list' on a regular basis but nothing ever happens.
10

English like wot she is meant to be spoke,

09/09/2008 14:17:24
The park and ride is a good idea, or at least it would be if it were in the right place.

The dualling of the A64 is a bit of a pipe dream, but we all agree surely it would be beneficial to the town.

However, what we really, really, really need is decent, affordable, safe and above all adequate car parking in the town.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.